Picnic Table Design, Part 1

Posted by Jeff Kupperman Sat, 30 Sep 2006 19:48:40 GMT

We bought our patio furniture for $15 a couple years ago, and it's done us well, but lately every yard gathering has included someone or something falling to the ground as a bench leg or chair seat has given way. Our picnic table has a pronounced tilt in it, too, and when I mentioned to my neighbor Gary Murphy that we were looking around for a way to replace it without spending hundreds of dollars, he offered to help me build a new one.

Gary runs a tree service as a vocation, and designs and builds furniture as an avocation. He also has plenty of access to wood and power tools -- a perk of being a professional tree-cutter. So I immediately took him up on his offer, though I had no idea where to even begin. It's turning out to be a terrific experience in design, and in contrast to the educational programs and software that I'm used to designing, it's extremely tangible and (literally) "hands-on." I dare say I may be able to draw out some general lessons about design, if you can bear with me and read on.

"Let's go look at some wood," Gary said to me, and a few days later, we drove up to where Gary's tree service rents land just north of Ann Arbor. At one end of the land, a small work shed and office share space with several farm buildings in various stages of collapse, along with numerous rusting shells of cars, trucks, boats, and trailers. In the center of this small compound, there is a modest pile of milled boards, some as much as ten feet long and two feet wide, covered with a small array of tarps and metal sheets to protect them from the rain and sun. Some of the lumber, I later learned, had been there for 25 years.

As we lifted one grey, aged board after another and put them aside, I had no idea what to look for. Gary, however, confidently assessed each piece, and soon we had a dozen or so pieces set aside. With a second pass through, we honed in on three pieces of red oak: a heavy plank cut from the middle of a sizable trunk, with a deep crack at one end and a sharp flare at the other, and two narrower pieces, each with one straight-cut edge and another edge that meandered restlessly. That settled (however tentatively), we turned our attention to what the planks would rest on. Gary had a large, knarly piece of sycamore stump with about 20 spindles branching upward in a vase-like shape, and being almost the right height already we fairly quickly decided that would support one end. For the other end, Gary suggested something metalic and modern, "for contrast."

We called it a day and headed home. "We've done the hardest part of a project," Gary said. "We've started."

Now, whatever truth or exaggeration there was to that statement, it is safe to say that this is not the way most people start out building a picnic table. More likely, they would measure the space, decide on size and materials, then find or make some drawings. In other words, they would make plans. But Gary started with "let's go look at some wood." The French call this "bricolage," a word without an exact English translation, but meaning something like "designing through tinkering." (Given Gary's taste for French wine and French antique shotguns, the French term suits him well.)

This is not to say that we are "letting the wood determine the design" -- far from it, we are working with quite a few constraints. The table must fit comfortably on the patio, for one thing (we did in fact measure the patio, though not until after our first trip out to look for wood). It has to be the right height to sit at, and be big enough to fit eight or ten sets of plates and glasses, plus some room for serving dishes and the like. It shouldn't poke people in the stomach or cause wine glasses to fall over. It has to be sturdy and hold up well to the elements. In the end, I don't need a sculpture or a flower planter or a tree house. I need a table.

Is it too much of a stretch to see this as a metaphor for educational design? The usual way to design instruction is to decide what the end result should be, map out a particular structure, list out the necessary materials, and then figure out step by step how to do it. But what if we started with the materials (maybe "the materials" are the students, maybe they are the content, maybe they are instructional tools), and gradually built instruction as we went? In other words, a bricolage approach to educational design....

The anthropologist Lucy Suchman argues that all plans contain an element of fiction -- a smoothing over of the endless small decisions that are made as a situation unfolds. Too much emphasis on the plan, she says, ignores how important those small decisions are. We might learn something about planning, she argues, from traditional Micronesian navigators, who sail with a goal but adjust their course in response to the circumstances of the moment.

Another anthropologist, Renato Rosaldo, writes about hunting in the Ilongot culture of the Philippines: the value of going on a hunt, even more than obtaining food, is the possibility that the hunters might bring back a good story. A hunt is important because something extraordinary, something surprising, might happen. Gary, who does in fact hunt, has taken this idea intuitively to furniture design. I have no idea if hunters are natural bricoleurs, but if we had started with a set of plans, we might have ended up with a serviceable picnic table, but hardly an interesting story.

Last week Gary and I went back out to work on the table. We looked again through the wood we had set aside, confirming our decision to use the three boards we had liked the last time for the table top. Then we started laying out the boards. Immediately we were confronted with an almost endless range of possibilities and decisions. Should we keep the interesting flare at one end of the big piece, or cut it down so it doesn't stick out and poke people? Do we keep the meandering edges on both sides, or cut them straight? Should we line up two big knots so that they are parallel, or stagger them? Should the middle piece be longer than the sides, or shorter, or should we "bump it out" a little so the table takes on a kind of arrow shape? Should the narrow edges be cut squarely, or at an angle? If an angle, how big should that angle be? In the end, many decisions came down to a choice between creating more order versus emphasizing the dramatic idiosyncrasies of the wood. Importantly, the quirks that remain should look consciously chosen, so that they don't look like mistakes or laziness: for example the big crack in the center piece would need to be sanded out and emphasized, and the offsets we decided upon for the side pieces need to be big enough that they don't appear to be accidental. "It has to look like you meant it," Gary said.

After an hour of laying out dozens of minute variations, making lots of pencil marks, imagining the table with people around it and plates and glasses on top, and looking at the pieces from every possible angle, with much "hmm"ing and beard stroking we came to a decision. Ultimately, the table top will have an overall shape somewhere between an oval and an egg, with "natural" edges on the long sides and slightly angled cuts on the narrow sides. We rough-cut the boards with a chain saw and circular saw, then brought them home to sand.

(To be continued...)


IMG_1299.JPG

Close-up of a partially sanded side piece.

IMG_1300.JPG

The crack in the center piece.

IMG_1301.JPG

A side piece, cut but not sanded.

IMG_1302.JPG

The three pieces, cut and laid out on the patio.

IMG_1298.JPG

The stripes on the wood are a result of the saw that cut the boards -- and they are proof that the boards are decades old, since modern saws don't leave those kinds of marks.

Leave a comment, View comments, View trackbacks

Your Comments.

Leave your own response

  1. chris fraleigh replied: I fully inderstand the concept of bricolage. Remember, Gary was instrumental in the sauna with which we are all happy users (abusers?). The Sauna, what an illustrative story for this concept. Several Christmases ago I gave my wonderful wife one of those "gifts", HA, which in actuality was nothing more than an IOU for next year. But hey, it could cover two seasons, right? So, in an effort to get a handle on just what the hell I had gotten myself into, I began to draw. That didn't help me much, so I went to speak with Jon VanEck and he gave me a really cool book dealing in nothing but saunas. This was one of those 60's-ish, early back to nature, do-it-yourself, off-the-grid type books. It really looked like nothing more than a type-written jounal kind of publication, yeah the old ones which was actually typed on one of those things called typwriters, remember those, with certain letters which would be slightly sub, or superscript? With this in hand I again began to draw. This time I took it to Gary, and we spoke about it for about an hour. And guess what he said? "Let's go look at wood!" Of course he prefaced that with "what do you think about alternative materials?" Does any of this sound familiar? So we go out to the very same Shady Tree yard you mention in the Quest For Picnic Table epic. He's got a pile of stickered and tin covered spruce planks and 5x7's. "Well Chris, this stuff has been sitting here for about 15 years, and it's either going in your sauna or it's gonna start roting." Yeah Baby!!!!! At this point I already had built a Wolmenized 8'x8' pallet on leveled and packed gravel in the location of the jog in the north property line with David and Gretchen. So we load this wood into the old 1982 F150 of Gary's and bring it all back to my place. The 5x7s are perfect for corner posts and wall center posts. So I get going on this. I really had nothing more than a plan in my head of how I wanted to do this. Gary was really liking that part. When it got to the part about roof rafters I needed real help, so I enlisted my brother Doug and Jeff Hagan. No slouches either one. So we get this thing framed sided and the roof framed. At which point Gary says, "You know that John Hosford has some corrugated fiberglass roofing material he could be convinced to let go. So again off we go..... Well it's about 10" thick of this stuff and I have to take it all or he will charge me $50. OK, not bad, now I have roofing and sides complete with Jeff's help. Progress! The really neatest part of this project so far is that without any figuring, there happened to be a match which came out of the ether. That match is the size of the 8x8 pallet I build, which happened before I even knew about the spruce. The spruce was almost exactly the volume of wood needed for the posts and the wall planks, right down to the board! What cool french term is there for this phenomena? Well the next hand Gary has in this is to sit in my kitchen with a glass of Scotch and a cigar and we get to talking about how to fire this thing. I'm thinking of going to Canada and buying a manufactured wood burning stove, and I tell him so. By the way this is the following January, yeah, 13 months after the initial "gift". "Well chris, if you are interested, I happen to have a stove which would be perfect for that sauna yer building, wanna go see it?" "Well I don't know, you've already put so much into this, I'd feel like a gluttonous pig taking anything more from you for this project." Aw come on, its out at the island (ok, remember, it's January....) So we get into the Isuzu and off we go. The lake is totally frozen (whew!!) and we go out to the shed behind the cabin, move piles of leaves and other detrius, or perhaps to continue the idiom, "gras dieu" (I have no idea how to spell gra-due). Well what do you think? I made it myself. So we brought a long black plastic sled, and we sledged that thing all the way back over the foot think snow covered ice to the Isuzu. The best part was rolling the thing down the incline to the water's edge. Now picture this, it is completely rusty and the door and legs are off, and it's been sitting for 12-15 years in the shed. Now is where the Gods come in to the picture. Gary tells me after we get it all the way back to my place that this little honey burned down the first one it was built into....on its second firing! Gary was somehwat reluctant to tell me this, I wonder why?? But not being one to look a gift horse in the mouth, I accept with the notion that I will FLY IN THE FACE OF THE GODS!!!! and just go ahead and install this thing, hey, it's cool and hand made by Gary. What more could you want, and for free!? Actually there is a cost involved. Gary has the right/authority/aegis to crank this baby up anytime he wants! and the best part for him is it's much closer to his house than the first one was. And the rest is history which you may know and be part of if you know Kupp and are reading this. That is all. CF
    Posted: 33 days later.
  2. chris fraleigh commented: OK, that thing had paragraphs when I typed it in??!
    Posted: 33 days later.
  3. Alexandra Dumas replied: Wow, i think that im the only one from IPD that replied on this blog...ok. Well, in my opinion, when to use and when not to use bricolage depends on if someone intends to plan something or design something. Using IPD as an example, I believe that our stategy so far (and unbeknownst to us) has been bricolage. We have the end result in mind - a burn/trauma website. However, the details of the components are just as much of a mystery to us as they were to you as you were searching in the wood. And, just as how your materials became more certain and clear as time passed, the exact components of our site will do the same. By designing a website, we are creating...which is a process. We will learn what is possible, what is not possible, what works better, what we should include, things not to do, etc.. Yes, we have guidelines, just as how the table needed to be a certain size and have certain functions. Yet the details were worked out in a guided yet not fully planned process...which applies to IPD. As I mentioned earlier, bricolage probubly isn't used as much when planning. For instance..a wedding. Everything is timed, organized, arranged, and planned to the smallest detail. There is generally no leeway for change. I guess it can be seen as a rather formulaic task, (get the cake, get the dress, etc...), yet the needs of the bride and groom are (hopefully) still met. Since we, in particular, are learning to design and code, I think that the only way to approach the website is through bricolage. Since none of us have ever done this before (well some have more experience but still...), and we constantly encounter technological problems, it is impossible to stick to an exact plan. Since the fall, we have altered ideas and goals and had to make adjustments for a downed server/internet. And, during these delays/decisions, new ideas have emerged that would not have arisin if we stuck to "the plan." Therefore, from a first-time designer perspective, bricolage is the only way to approach the task at hand, because that is ultimately what will occur through a series of natural events. Sorry its a day late!
    Posted: 41 days later.
  4. Becca Targan commented: I feel like the idea of bricolage and the idea of planning something out to a T (is that the right phrasing?) are always somewhat mixed, and it's just the ratio of the two that should be the issue. The article talked about applying this idea to school, but i think it's already there to a degree. Let's say there are two teachers in a school; one lectures from the same 23 year old notes and gives the same 23 year old tests, while the other doesn't even use the concept of grades and lets the students design the curriculum as the year progresses. While there may be a few examples of both of the kinds of teachers, most are somewhere in between. Teachers usually have a planned course for the year-even for the day-but circumstances usually end up changing their plans, and the next year they are different according to what happened in previous years. In other words, they learn from their mistakes. Even the teacher who uses the same notes every year probably experimented previous to using those notes, and finally settled on ones that would work due to past experience. And no teacher just walks into a room without any plan whatsoever. Even if they do, they plan to walk into the room. So no matter what, there will always be some mix of the two ideas. Again, it's just a matter of how much of each we should be using. The situation in which to use a lot or a little bricolage varies. As the site says, even the designing of the table used some planning. Yet in the end it was probably best to tinker with the results because Jeff wanted the table to function, yet look nice, or, as Gary said, "It has to look like you meant it." So for someone learning how to design, there should be at least some structure, or at the very least someone who knows what they're doing to provide that structure (ie Gary in this example). Jeff couldn't have designed the table at all if he had no clue what went into making a table. If he didn't know that the table needed to be X inches tall or Y inches wide or accomodate 12 people or needed to have room for plates, the table would not have functioned properly and would not have been usable. Without some steletal planning, the table would have been worthless. Yet if it he had planned it to have minimal leg room and then built it, he may have realized after the fact that if he ever invited Weisserman over, he wouldn't have been able to even fit his legs between the table's benches and actual tabletop. The table would be worthless in this situation as well. The same goes for websites. If you don't know at least very basic html, or someone that can help you with it, the site won't even load without an error message. And if you decide there will be one page with five links and the container will be 600 pixels wide no matter what happens, you may realize after the fact that you actually needed six links and the container is much too wide and that you really needed three separate pages. The site thus won't work as well as it could. In ipd, I think everyone was pretty set on the site having this many components etc, but if we realize we need one more or that we don't need a different one, we have to be willing to change it or the site won't help the client as well as it could. In the end, everything needs to find a happy medium between bricolage and planning. Neither approach is better than the other, because both approaches require a little bit of the other mixed in.
    Posted: 43 days later.
  5. Debbie Simons replied: Although this bricolage concept truly applies to IPD, I believe that there must be some sort of planning involved before we take acion. Right now everyone has such a broad view of what will be on our site. There are so many subcomponents to each of the four components (education/prevention, school re-entry, communciation/connection, entertainment)that it is nearly impossible to "just start programing". I have to admit, although I am a spontanious, "just do it" type of girl, when it comes to important projects and school work I have a tendency to look before I leap. My only concern with a bricolage approach to IPD is that we will spend so much time in our groups programing and coding our site, that it will be too late to go back and change something. That when we're all done and the site is ready to be turned over to UofM Burn Trauma Unit, we will be dissapointed because we wanted to add something else or do something new on our site. I do believe that the best way of learning is to get one's hands dirty and just try new things that learn from one's mistakes, however it seems very far fetched to jump into such an important assignment without proper planning beforehand.
    Posted: 45 days later.

Spread the word.

Jeff Kupperman supports RSS (Real Simple Syndication), and Trackbacks from other blogs.

RSS feed for this post Trackback URI

Your Reply

Comment Form.

Fields denoted with a "*" are required.

You may also like to leave your email or website.