POOT mentors and facilitators:
Recently (in the real world), a man named David Irving was imprisoned in Austria for violating that country's "Verbotsgesetz," or Nazi Prohibition Law. Our proposed scenario for the Fall POOT would connect with that news and the idea of forbidding the public articulation of certain ideas, by inventing an Austrian high school student who, as editor of her school's student newspaper, publishes an article in opposition to the letter and the spirit of the law that led to Irving's imprisonment. The student is then suspended from school until she makes a formal apology and retraction, but defiant, she brings the case to the Court of All Time.
Potential ideas and questions that could be explored include:
- Thinking about what is "true" and how we decide what is true.
- What do we need to know to make judgments?
- The dangers behind what is said and what is not said.
- What does it mean to be curious about things that people (polite society) would rather not talk about?
- How do we...as individuals, or as a nation...make amends for our past?
- How do we manage the (potential) dangers of ideas/movements generally found to be odious, hateful, etc?
- How do we do honor to something catastrophic?
We also might do some more with requesting depositions from attendees:
"What insights could you share with the court about how you handled such issues in your time?"
"How can you draw upon your experience in a way that could help the court get to the core issues?"
It would seem that we could make easy jumps to issues like internet filtering, national identity and how we present ourselves as a nation, freedom of expression/misrepresentation, Danish cartoons, etc.
In any event, please let us hear your thoughts and suggestions....